Marxists and Social Standards by Tim Manning

Tim Manning

The primary work of agnostics in establishing Marxism is to displace the foundation of Christian morals, standards and social practices in order to establish the idolatrous authority of the creatures over the Creator, since Marxism cannot exist where Biblical Christianity exists. Marxists select cultural practices at odds with the culture of the Christian country in which they live in order to establish new social “Gospels” in which the central state government assumes to itself to be the “highest moral authority” and the power to establish new social Gospels for the “redemption of mankind.” Then the state begins its campaign of "socially re-engineering" the culture in a manner that will focus on men's sense of “fairness” rather than God's “Righteousness.” “Political Correctness” must replace the glorious focus on the “Righteousness of God.” Socialism is inherently at war against Christianity and the belief in God.

Elements of Political Correctness, in and of themselves, need not be “evil” in the classical Biblical sense. They only need to serve to focus the attention on the central state and to enhance its authority which in the end WILL seek to establish outright unrighteousness as it destroys the authority of God in the life of men and destroys the power of God over governments and nations. This is why the power of the central state MUST NOT EVER BE ALLOWED to establish the universal forced views of social and cultural standards.

Millions of western Christians have been enticed by the new sense of being “politically correct” and continuously reforming social and cultural redefinitions proffered by those who use the secular central state to establish “social justice”, even though centuries of violence testify against the idolatry of the governments of men. So we saw in the United States churches like the Baptist Church energize the tide of socialism (statism most foul) by supporting and swallowing the lure (the bait) of “Civil Rights.” Without the support of the Baptist churches socialism in the USA would be in a much weakened condition unless some other denomination would have stepped forward which is likely. Most other denominations followed the lead of the Baptist church in this regard. This was the inauguration in an official manner of the kingdom and authority of men over the Kingdom and authority of God.

The state posed as dissatisfied with the progress of God working among His people in order to usurp Gods authority over His people. Thus we came to accept “Civil Rights” over “Human Rights” and displacing “Human” Rights that had always been defined by God in the revelation of His Will as we have it in the Holy Bible. The classical understanding of “Right” is defined by God and revealed in His Character. Right means “Righteousness” of which God is the original Author. This is the Greek term “dikaiosune” pronounced “dik-ah-yos-oo'-nay” from the Greek “δίκαιος.”

“Right” or “Righteousness” may be understood by a term long abandoned by liberal American Christians “Holiness” which can only be defined by God, is seen in His Character and only practiced by fallen humanity through the indwelling of His Holy Spirit. The principles contained in the great Ten Commandments define for me the primary standards of “Righteousness” and “Holiness.” In other words all that a government of men can do is to recognize the “Rights” of the Holiness of God and make laws that reflect what God desires of and for mankind and then within limits because of the inherent nature of men seeking to “overrule” the authority of God.

Simply put, “There are no 'Civil Rights.'” There are only “Human Rights” defined by God. The very use of “Civil” with the word “Rights” is idolatrous and intended to usurp the power and authority of God in a persons life, in a culture and in a government.

Socialism is the religion of the secularists of our day and has been made the step child of western Christianity. Civil Rights as practiced in government is inherently unrighteous and is used for political reasons to hurt some and benefit others; whereas “Holiness” and “Righteousness” benefits everyone and is truly “fair” to all.